Hi:

I came across the source citation for a couple of ancestors who were from Oisterwijk.  The citation I am referring to is "Oisterwijk kerkrekeningen 1682-1734, Archnr.34 nr.112-123."  In checking FamilySearch as well as the https://www.regionaalarchieftilburg.nl/, I could not locate anything related to this source for burials.

Does anyone have an idea what this is and where it can possibly be accessed online?

Thanks.

Steve

You are right; it appears they just don't exist. At least not in the Oisterwijk archives https://www.bhic.nl/genealogie/dtb/8087.htm

I suggest you should contact the publisher directly: https://www.genealogieonline.nl/contact.php?bron=4420

Voor de forumleden, het gaat hier over: https://www.genealogieonline.nl/genealogische-verzameling-van-beurden/I3627.php

it might be archive# 734 "Inventaris van het archief van de RK Parochie St. Petrus Banden te Oisterwijk, 1408 - 1986" [here] - the numbers 112-123 are financial records:

I have very little experience with genealogy in Brabant, but the information from Peter B might hit the spot. "Jaarrekeningen" are annual financial records (in this case from the churchwardens) and might show the amounts of money collected during burials, thus showing who was interred at the time. Weddings, too, were accompanied by collections.

Ask for Toegang 734, nrs. 112 to 123; most likely they won't be accessible on-line, but someone local may offer to look it up for you.

Thanks everyone for your helpful comments.  Very much appreciated.

There is no archive number 34 in the RAT. The numbering jumps from 33 to 35.
Possibly the original source reference has either been a typo (734 instead of 34) or the source reference refers to an old archive numbering and then you would need a concordance table to 'translate' old number to new number.
The solution that Petra suggested seems the most likely to me.

Michaël

There is no archive number 34 in the RAT. The numbering jumps from 33 to 35.
Possibly the original source reference has either been a typo (734 instead of 34) or the source reference refers to an old archive numbering and then you would need a concordance table to 'translate' old number to new number.
The solution that Petra suggested seems the most likely to me.

Michaël