Several years ago, I thought I had reached a dead end with Trijntje Pieters Stam. Recent findings (from this website: http://www.daas.info/stamboom/stam/pieter.htm and additional research) now make it very clear that the Trijntje baptized on 8 February 1704 in Monnickendam — daughter of Pieter Sijmonsz Stam and Maritje Dircks van Poelenburg — is indeed the same woman who married Jan Jansz Moerbuijck 'de oude' on 4 April 1734 in Beemster. She was buried in Beemster on 26 March 1784.
This brings us back to her father, Pieter Sijmonsz Stam. He is referred to as "Pieter(oom)" in Trijntje’s baptism record. A 1703 entry in the Monnickendam court register records his marriage to Maritje, with Pieter assisted by his guardian Harmen Jansz Donkers (his father having already died) and Maritje assisted by her father, Dirk Pietersz van Poelenburg.
A second Pieter Sijmonsz Stam from Purmer also appears in baptismal and marriage records, with some overlapping family connections (especially baptismal witnesses). However, this Pieter is consistently referred to as Pieteroom in those records.
The family structure of Sijmen Claesz Stam (b. Purmer ca. 1633, d. Monnickendam 31 Jan 1703) and Trijntje Teunis (married Purmerend 11 Nov 1657) shows multiple children, including two Pieters:
- Pieter (b. Purmer ca. 1670), married Annetie Dirckx
- Pieteroom (b. Purmer ca. 1679), married Maritie Dircks van Poelenburg
It therefore appears that the "kint van Pieter Stam" 1704 burial reference points to the Pieter who married Annetie Dirckx — not Pieteroom Sijmonsz Stam (who married Maritje Dircks van Poelenburg). These are two distinct individuals.
The researcher’s conclusion (http://www.daas.info/stamboom/stam/sijmen.htm):
"An announcement of the marriage of Sijmon Claesz Stam, a young man from Purmer, and Trijntje Teunis, a young woman also from Purmer, on 28 October 1657 at the town hall in Purmerend. Trijntje's parents were possibly Theunis Pietersz, a young man and citizen of Purmerend, and Maritgen Pieters, a young woman living in Neck, who married on 18 January 1633 at the town hall in Purmerend.
Although all the children carried the surname Stam with the patronymic Sijmensz, it is unclear whether they all came from the same parents. It seems strange, for example, that both Pieters belong to this family. Unfortunately, baptismal records provide no clue. A possible explanation could be that Pieteroom was explicitly named after his uncle Pieter, of whom no married descendants have been found."
It now appears the issue has been resolved with these distinctions between the two Pieters. The excellent research on this site has filled in several key gaps!
If anyone has additional sources or thoughts that might further confirm or refine this, I would still be grateful.
Regards,
Steve